*Only hours after the SFA’s announcement on Lucas Paquetá, he launched an attack on the referee in a public post — and it could cost him months on the sidelines**
The whirlwind surrounding Lucas Paquetá took a dramatic new turn on Tuesday evening, as the West Ham midfielder found himself at the center of yet another storm—this time of his own making. Just hours after the Scottish Football Association issued a formal update on the ongoing investigation involving the Brazilian international, Paquetá stunned fans, pundits, and club officials by launching a scathing public message aimed directly at referee Andrew Callaghan. The post, now deleted but widely circulated across social media, has sparked immediate questions about potential disciplinary action, with some insiders suggesting he could face a lengthy suspension on top of his existing troubles.
Paquetá’s message was reportedly triggered by a series of contentious decisions made during West Ham’s weekend clash. The midfielder was visibly frustrated during the match, repeatedly gesturing towards the officials and having to be calmed down by teammates. But few expected him to take those frustrations online—especially with the SFA’s announcement still fresh in the public eye. The governing body had earlier confirmed that the investigation into alleged regulatory breaches involving Paquetá was moving into a new phase, increasing scrutiny on his conduct both on and off the pitch.
In his post, Paquetá accused Callaghan of “destroying the integrity of the match,” claiming that several decisions were “clearly biased” and calling for “accountability from the people who hold the whistle.” The tone of the message immediately raised eyebrows, not only because of its directness but also because of the timing. Players are required to adhere to strict rules regarding public criticism of referees, and the SFA has historically taken a firm stance on breaches of these regulations. Past incidents of online criticism have resulted in fines, suspensions, and in some cases mandatory hearings.
Sources close to West Ham say the club was completely blindsided. Paquetá’s representatives were reportedly contacted within minutes of the post gaining traction, and internal discussions began almost immediately about damage control. While Paquetá deleted the message shortly after posting it, screenshots had already spread across football circles, and several media outlets reported on its contents before the club had issued any comment.
The SFA has yet to release an official response, but early indications suggest a formal charge is likely. If found guilty of misconduct, Paquetá could face a multi-match suspension or even a ban that stretches into months—an outcome that would be disastrous for both the player and his club. West Ham, already dealing with squad pressure and inconsistent form, may now be preparing for the possibility of losing one of their most influential players for an extended period.
Fans remain divided. Some sympathize with Paquetá’s frustration, arguing that refereeing standards have dipped and that players deserve a voice. Others believe his outburst was reckless, ill-timed, and harmful to a team already under scrutiny. Regardless of opinion, one thing is clear: Paquetá has added a fresh layer of chaos to a situation that was already volatile. The fallout could reshape not just his season, but his entire future in the league.
